Annex 1
City of York Council
Annual Complaints Report
April 2021 – March 2022
Bryn Roberts
Director of Governance and Monitoring Officer
Cath Murray
Corporate Governance Operational Manager (which includes Designated Complaints Officer for children’s social care complaints and Complaints Manager for adult social care complaints).
Index
Title Section
Introduction 1
Ombudsman Investigations and Annual Review Letter 2
What is a complaint 3
Effectiveness of the Procedures 4
Themes 5
Cost of delivering the complaints procedure 6
Children’s Social Care Complaints
Context 7
Who can make a complaint 8
Grading of Complaints 9
Activity 10
Total Complaints Made 11
Comparison with the preceding year 12
Outcomes of complaints 13
Response Times 14
Stage One 15
Stage Two 16
Stage Three 17
Percentage Escalation 18
Equalities Monitoring Information 19
Who made the complaints 20
Costs and Payments 21
Alternative Dispute Resolution 22
Learning Lessons/Practice Improvements 23
Adult Social Care Complaints
Context 24
Who can make a complaint 25
Grading of Complaints 26
Activity 27
Comparison with the preceding year 28
Outcomes of complaints 29
Response Times 30
Green 31
Amber 32
Red 33
Equalities Monitoring Information 34
Who made the complaints 35
Payments 36
Alternative Dispute Resolution 37
Complaints dealt with by The Local Authority and NHS Bodies 38
Learning Lessons/Practice Improvements 39
Public Health 40
Corporate Complaints Procedure
Context 41
Who can make a complaint 42
Grading of Complaints 43
Response Times 44
Detail of complaints
Stage One 45
Stage Two 46
Stage Three 47
Learning Lessons/Practice Improvements 48
Payments 49
Alternative Dispute Resolution 50
Details of LGSCO cases & compliance Report Annex 1
The LGSCO provides an annual review letter about the council covering April to March each year. This includes tables presenting the number of complaints and enquiries received about the council and the decisions the LGSCO has made during the reporting period. This is to help us assess our performance in handling complaints. It includes the number of cases where the LGSCO’s recommendations remedied the fault and the number of cases where they decided we had had offered a satisfactory remedy during our local complaints process. In these latter cases the LGSCO provides reassurance that we had satisfactorily attempted to resolve the complaint before the person went to them.
LGSCO Total Decided Cases
LGSCO decided cases |
2020 - 2021 |
2021 - 2022 |
||
How many? |
% Rounded down to whole number |
How many? |
% Rounded down to whole number |
|
Closed after initial enquiries |
17 |
39% |
29 |
40% |
Referred for local resolution |
6 |
14% |
14 |
19% |
Advice given |
1 |
2% |
4 |
5% |
Incomplete/invalid |
1 |
2% |
2 |
2% |
Not upheld – detailed investigations |
7 |
16% |
3 |
4% |
Upheld – detailed investigations |
12 |
27% |
19 |
26% |
Total |
44 |
|
71 |
|
The LGSCO’s 19 upheld decisions had the following remedies
Remedy
|
|
Number |
|
Apology |
1 |
Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble |
1 |
Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, financial redress: Loss of service |
1 |
Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss |
1 |
Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss, Procedure, or policy change/review, provide services to person affected |
1 |
Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, new appeal/review, or reconsidered decision |
1 |
Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, provide information/advice to person affected, Procedure or policy change/review |
1 |
Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, Provide training and/or guidance |
1 |
Apology, Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss |
1 |
Apology, New appeal/review, or reconsidered decision, Provide training and/or guidance |
1 |
Apology, provide information/advice to person affected, Provide training and/or guidance |
1 |
Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble |
1 |
Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, provide services to person affected, provide services/information to others affected |
1 |
No remedy recommended |
6 |
Total |
19 |
· 86% of all detailed investigation were upheld. This compares to an average of 64% in similar authorities. However, when considered from all decided cases it is 26% were upheld
· In 100% of cases the Ombudsman were satisfied that the authority has successfully implemented their recommendations. This compares to an average of 99% in similar authorities.
· In 11% of upheld cases the Ombudsman found the authority had provided a satisfactory remedy before the complaint reached the Ombudsman. This compares to an average of 12% in similar authorities. In practice this means that although the Ombudsman found there had been fault, the authority had already acknowledged this and provided an appropriate remedy. The aim of the complaints team is to identify and offer appropriate remedies where fault has occurred.
Further details from the LGSCO’s annual report with the breakdown of cases they dealt with, and the outcomes found for this reporting period are included at annex 1.
In 2021 to 2022 there were 3 cases determined by the HOS. Of these:
· 1 was upheld as service failure without a public report – the council complied with all actions.
· 1 was resolved with early intervention/resolution – the council apologised, completed repairs, and paid £150.00
· 1 was closed as no maladministration
3 What is a Complaint?
A complaint is an expression of dissatisfaction however made, about the actions, decisions, or apparent failings of a local authority’s social services provision, and/or the level or nature of a council service or policy, which requires a response. If it is possible to resolve the complaint immediately this does not need to be logged through the complaint procedure.
A complaint is not a request for a service that is made for the first time. For example, if a customer complains that a streetlight is not working, we will treat it as a service request that we aim to fulfil by repairing it within the service level agreement. If we then fail to repair it within that timescale, and the customer is still unhappy, it should then be defined and treated as a complaint
6 Cost of delivering the complaints procedure including the corporate procedure:
There are ongoing costs attached to delivering an efficient and effective complaints service. These costs should be seen against the inherent costs of not providing this service. These may include customer dissatisfaction escalating, an increase in number of and amount awarded as financial remedies being recommended by the LGSCO, increased judicial reviews and non-compliance with legislation.
The total actual spends for the full service including the Information Governance provision, salary and on-costs was £363,727.
The financial remedies payments made as part of the three different complaints procedures are provided at sections 21, 36 and 49 later of this report.
The council must provide investigating officers and independent people for social care complaints where required and the costs for this in this reporting period was £34622 compared to £60424 last year. This includes the core costs for the service provision. It is noted this is significantly lower than the previous year. It is considered this is due to the work to improve the quality and timeliness of responses in children’s services in the previous year. However as this has not been maintained it is anticipated this will increase in the next reporting period.
The CGT has however continued to work with the agency and managers to better understand and manage these costs without impacting on the thoroughness or independence of the investigation. This has included looking at improving the efficiency around provision of information and arrangements for interviews with staff.
Annual Children’s Social Care Complaints and Representations Report
April 2021 – March 2022
7 Context
The following information relates to complaints made during the twelve months between 1st April 2021 and 31st March 2022 for children under the Children Act 1989 Representations Procedure (England) Regulations 2006.
All timescales contained within this report are for working days.
In addition, the numbers of compliments are also recorded, and these are:
Compliments received
14/15 |
15/16 |
16/17 |
17/18 |
18/19 |
19/20 |
20/21 |
21/22 |
3 |
23 |
6 |
17 |
22 |
22 |
59 |
21 |
The CGT are aware that many more compliments are received and actively work to encourage staff and teams to forward these to ensure they are recorded. This is to ensure we can provide an accurate picture of our customers’ experiences of the services they receive.
The compliments received include:
· Social worker wonderful, quick to answer, sorted out holiday and overnight respite
· Thanks to social worker for all their support with the family
· Thanks to worker for all their help with Children in Need and family
· Thanks, from a judge for all the preparation and hard work on the case
· Thanks for all the time spent helping the family
· Thanks for patience, kindness, help and advice
· Worker great moving things forward, supporting adoption process, valued support & input
· appreciated wonderful support
· Thanks for support of foster carer, values support of children as well & detailed feedback in review
The legislation makes it clear that people should be able to provide feedback and have this responded to, without this being seen as a complaint. Therefore concerns, comments and requests are also logged.
The number of concerns, comments and requests received in this period were:
Numbers of Concerns, Comments and Requests
14/15 |
15/16 |
16/17 |
17/18 |
18/19 |
19/20 |
20/21 |
21/22 |
6 |
14 |
11 |
26 |
20 |
33 |
29 |
19 |
A concern is logged when someone wants to tell us about a problem, without wanting this to be considered as a complaint.
A comment or request is logged when someone suggests, or request. This is then passed to the appropriate person to respond to the issues being raised. If a person remains dissatisfied after receiving a response, this would then be logged as a complaint.
8 Who can make a Complaint?
· Any child or young person (or a parent, or someone who has parental responsibility) who is being looked after by the local authority or is not looked after by them but is in need.
· Any local authority foster carer (including those caring for children placed through independent fostering agencies).
· Children leaving care
· Special Guardians
· A child or young person (or parent) to whom a Special Guardian order is in place.
· Any person who has applied for an assessment under section 14F (3) or (4).
· Any child or young person who may be adopted, their parents and guardians.
· Persons wishing to adopt a child.
· Any other person whom arrangements for the provision of adoption services extend.
· Adopted persons, their parents, natural parents and former guardians and such other person as the local authority consider has sufficient interest in the child or young person’s welfare to warrant their representations being considered by them.
Where a complaint is received from a representative on behalf of a child or young person, we will, where appropriate, confirm that the child or young person is happy for this to happen and that the complaint received reflects their views.
The CGOM in consultation with relevant operational managers will decide whether the person is suitable to act in this capacity and has sufficient interest in the child’s welfare. If it is decided that a person is not suitable to act as a representative for a child, they will be informed of the decision in writing by the CGOM. The complaint will then fall outside the statutory procedure. They will however be able to complain through the 4Cs corporate complaints procedure.
Complaints may also be made by adults relating to a child or young person but are not being made on their behalf. The CGOM in consultation with operational managers will decide whether the person has sufficient interest in the child’s welfare for the complaint to be considered. The child may also be consulted as part of the decision-making process.
9 Grading of Complaints
Complaints are graded following an assessment of issues including severity, complexity, risk to the customer and other customers, risk to the authority, history of similar complaints and likelihood of future similar complaints. Other considerations include, the outcomes wanted to resolve the complaint, who is best placed to consider and effectively respond to the complaint and the complainant’s views of how the complaint should be dealt with.
Stage One.
Is dealt with by line managers of the service area the complaint concerns, this includes where the service is being provided on behalf of the council by an external contractor. The expectation is that the managers will have the knowledge and understanding of the issues and delegated responsibility to be able to resolve complaints at this stage quickly, without the need for an in-depth formal investigation.
The legislation requires complaints at stage one to be responded to within 10 working days. This can be extended for a further 10 working days in some circumstances, for example where further time is needed to arrange an advocate, or where staff may be away from work. This can only be extended with the agreement of the complainant.
Stage Two.
This stage is implemented where the complainant is dissatisfied with the findings of stage one, or where it is assessed as being appropriate to be considered and responded to at this stage, due to issues including the severity, complexity, or risk. Stage two requires an investigation conducted by either an internal manager who has not had any previous involvement in the complaint and has no line management responsibility for the area being complained about, or an external investigating officer. The Director of Children’s Safeguarding adjudicates on the findings of the investigation.
The council must offer an advocate to assist children and young people in making a complaint and appoint an Independent Person to oversee the investigation process at this stage. Stage two complaints falling within the social services statutory complaints procedures should be dealt with in 25 days, although in certain cases this can be extended to 65 days.
Stage Three.
The third stage of the complaints process is the review panel. Where complainants wish to proceed with complaints about statutory social service functions, the council is required to establish a complaints review panel. The panel makes recommendations to the Corporate Director of Children and Education, who then decides and provides a written response on the complaint and any action to be taken.
Complaints review panels must be made up of 3 independent panellists. There are various timescales relating to stage three complaints. These are:
· setting up the panel within 30 working days.
· producing the panel’s report within 5 working days of the panel; and
· producing the local authority’s response within 15 days following receipt of the report.
A further option for complainants is the LGSCO who is empowered to investigate where it appears that a council’s own investigations have not resolved the complaint. Complainants can refer their complaint to the LGSCO at any time, although the Ombudsman normally refers the complaint back to the council, unless the council has been given sufficient opportunity to consider and respond to the complaint.
10 Activity
The CGT recorded 42 complaints under the children’s social care procedure during the year, compared with a total of 55 last year.
An additional 4 complaints were received through the 4Cs corporate complaints procedure, compared to 1 in the previous year.
11 Total complaints made:
Of the 42 complaints dealt with:
· 31 were investigated at stage one of the social care procedures,
· 3 progressed to stage two, with 1 of these being from the previous reporting period.
· 10 complaints in total heard at stage two with 7 of these being moved straight to stage 2, due to their complexity and or severity.
· 1 complaint was raised at stage 3, but not pursued to the panel.
12 Comparison with the preceding year
The numbers of complaints being received are small and typically fluctuate each year and this is typical of social care complaints received across Yorkshire and Humberside. The figures show a decrease of 24% for this reporting period. The reasons for this are noted in the following information.
13 Outcomes of Complaints – total
|
2017-2018 |
2018-2019 |
2019 - 2020 |
2020 - 2021 |
2021-2022 |
Upheld |
4 |
6 |
19 |
8 |
3 |
Partly upheld |
10 |
19 |
27 |
17 |
11 |
Not upheld |
20 |
14 |
12 |
16 |
12 |
Not proved |
0 |
0 |
2 |
- |
- |
Not pursued |
2 |
5 |
14 |
9 |
5 |
No response |
2 |
- |
16 |
2 |
9 |
Ongoing |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
Total |
40 |
44 |
91 |
55 |
42 |
14 Response Times
A key requirement of complaints procedures is to ensure that individuals are informed of the outcome of their complaints, in an appropriate time frame.
The timescales in working days for children’s social care complaints as set out in the regulation are:
· 10 days at Stage 1 (with a further 10 days for more complex complaints or additional time if an advocate is required).
· 25 days at Stage 2 (with maximum extension to 65 days).
· 20 days for the complainant to request a Review Panel.
· 30 days to convene and hold the Review Panel at Stage 3.
· 5 days for the Panel to issue its findings: and
· 15 days for the local authority to respond to the findings.
Details of Complaints by stage
15 Stage One Complaints
There were 31 stage one complaints compared to 41 last year.
We are pleased to note that as expected the numbers during this reporting period have reduced since the previous year.
Although it is not considered receiving larger numbers of complaints is always a negative, because this can show that the procedure is accessible, and customers are supported to make complaints which provide invaluable feedback.
These have been categorised as follows:
Stage One - Theme of complaint
|
2018 – 2019 |
2019 - 20 |
2020 - 21 |
2021 - 22 |
Attitude of staff |
|
- |
- |
1 |
Disagree with Policy |
1 |
- |
1 |
1 |
Disagree with Assessment |
9 |
13 |
7 |
5 |
Discrimination |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
Inappropriate Action |
12 |
32 |
10 |
5 |
Lack of Action |
6 |
22 |
9 |
11 |
Quality of Advice/Communication |
5 |
5 |
14 |
8 |
TOTAL |
34 |
72 |
41 |
31 |
You will note that the lack of action is the highest theme this year and higher than in previous years. However, this includes failings in communication and this theme remains the highest area of complaint.
Stage One - Responding in time performance
|
2017 - 2018 |
%* |
2018 - 2019 |
%* |
2019 - 2020 |
%* |
2020 - 2021 |
%* |
2021 - 2022 |
%* |
Within 10 days |
24 |
80% |
17 |
50% |
31 |
43% |
20 |
49% |
11 |
35% |
Within 20 days |
5 |
17% |
12 |
34% |
8 |
11% |
6 |
15% |
1 |
3% |
Over 20 days |
0 |
- |
1 |
2% |
20 |
28% |
7 |
17% |
16 |
52% |
Not Pursued |
1 |
3% |
4 |
11% |
13 |
18% |
8 |
19% |
3 |
10% |
TOTAL |
30 |
|
34 |
|
72 |
|
41 |
|
31 |
|
*% figures are rounded to the nearest whole number
We are concerned about the number of complaints where responses were sent late to the customer and where no response was received by the Corporate Governance Team (CGT) at this stage.
We are aware that where the complaint is recorded as no response sent, managers may have responded verbally to customers and not updated the CGT team. It is also possible managers may have sent written responses and not forwarded these to the CGT. It is however of the upmost importance that the CGT are updated with the progress of complaints. This is so that performance in this area can be monitored and reported accurately.
The significant objective of complaints is so that actions can be identified to resolve the complaint for the customer and lessons learnt to improve service. The CGT continues to remind managers of the importance of ensuring they are updated on the outcome of complaints and are provided with responses, so that the council can ensure appropriate lessons are learnt, actioned, and reported.
Stage One - Outcomes
|
2017 - 2018 |
%* |
2018 - 2019 |
%* |
2019 - 2020 |
%* |
2020 - 2021 |
%* |
2021 - 2022 |
%* |
Upheld |
3 |
10% |
3 |
8% |
16 |
22% |
8 |
19% |
3 |
10% |
Partially Upheld |
7 |
23% |
14 |
41% |
15 |
21% |
7 |
17% |
7 |
22% |
Not Upheld |
16 |
53% |
13 |
38% |
10 |
14% |
16 |
39% |
9 |
29% |
Not Proven |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
2 |
3% |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
Not Pursued |
2 |
7% |
4 |
11% |
13 |
18% |
8 |
19% |
3 |
10% |
No response |
2 |
7% |
- |
- |
16 |
22% |
2 |
5 % |
9 |
29% |
TOTAL |
30 |
|
34 |
|
72 |
|
41 |
|
31 |
|
*% figures are rounded to the nearest whole number
16 Stage Two Complaints
Stage Two - Theme of Complaint
|
2017 - 2018 |
2018 - 2019 |
2019 - 2020 |
2020 - 2021 |
2021 - 2022 |
Attitude of staff |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
Disagree with Policy |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Disagree with Assessment |
1 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
- |
Discrimination |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Inappropriate Action |
4 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
4 |
Lack of Action |
3 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
Quality of Advice/Communication |
2 |
- |
1 |
- |
3 |
TOTAL |
10 |
10 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
Stage Two – Responding in time performance
|
2017 - 2018 |
%* |
2018 - 2019 |
%* |
2019 - 2020 |
%* |
2020 - 2021 |
%* |
2021 - 2022 |
%* |
Within 25days |
6 |
60% |
1 |
10% |
3 |
17% |
2 |
21% |
0 |
- |
Within 65 days |
0 |
- |
2 |
20% |
3 |
17% |
- |
- |
0 |
- |
Over timescale |
4 |
40% |
6 |
60% |
9 |
51% |
4 |
44% |
7 |
70% |
Not Pursued |
0 |
- |
1 |
10% |
1 |
6% |
- |
- |
1 |
10% |
Ongoing |
0 |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
6% |
3 |
33% |
2 |
20% |
TOTAL |
10 |
|
10 |
|
17 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
It is noted for all but the complaint, which was not pursued, all responses at this stage were “over the timescale”. It is important to remember, complaints at this stage are often complex, with several elements and there may also be the need to arrange advocates and appointments with both staff and complainants, particularly at adjudication.
It is however noted that many of the responses at this stage in this reporting period, had further delays following the departure of the previous Assistant Director, who would normally have responded to these complaints. This coincided with the Corporate Director post also being vacant. There were then significant difficulties identifying managers to take on the responsibility of the Adjudicating Officer and providing responses. This also impacted on the ability to provide appropriate updates to complainants, and we are aware this led to further upset and frustration for complainants.
The importance of keeping complainants up to date especially where there are delays in responding to their complaints, cannot be overstated. The CGT is working with the newly appointed Corporate Director and Director, as well as other managers to ensure this is improved for the current reporting period.
Stage Two Outcomes
|
2017 - 2018 |
%* |
2017 - 2018 |
%* |
2019 - 2020 |
%* |
2020 – 2021 |
%* |
2021 - 2022 |
%* |
Upheld |
- |
|
3 |
30% |
2 |
12% |
- |
- |
- |
|
Partially Upheld |
3 |
30% |
5 |
50% |
11 |
65% |
6 |
67% |
4 |
|
Not Upheld |
3 |
30% |
1 |
10% |
2 |
12% |
- |
- |
3 |
30% |
Not Pursued |
2 |
20% |
1 |
30% |
1 |
6% |
- |
- |
1 |
10% |
No response sent |
2 |
20% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Ongoing |
- |
|
- |
- |
1 |
6% |
3 |
33% |
2 |
20% |
TOTAL |
10 |
|
10 |
|
17 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
The CGT continued to work to ensure that complaints at this stage were not forgotten about and responses where provided, regardless of the time this took to achieve.
17 Stage Three Complaints
There was 1 children’s stage three complaint, compared with 5 in the previous reporting period. It is considered this is because of the improvements in the quality and timeliness of responses made in the previous reporting period and that as these improvements have not continued it is likely the number of stage 3 complaints in the next reporting period will increase.
The process at stage three of the Children’s Social Care Complaints Procedure is an independent review panel that will consider whether the investigation, findings, and recommendations at stage two, were thorough, logical, and fair. The Panel then provides a report to the Corporate Director of Children and Education with their conclusions and any recommendations considered appropriate. The Corporate Director would then respond confirming whether they agree with the conclusions and any recommendations made.
Stage Three - Theme of Complaint
|
2018 -2019 |
2019 - 2020
|
2020 - 2021 |
2021 -2022 |
Attitude of staff |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Disagree with Policy |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Disagree with Assessment |
- |
- |
- |
-- |
Discrimination |
- |
- |
- |
|
Inappropriate Action |
- |
- |
4 |
1 |
Lack of Action |
- |
2 |
1 |
|
Quality of Advice/Communication |
- |
- |
- |
- |
TOTAL |
- |
- |
5 |
1 |
Stage Three - Responding in time performance
|
2018 - 2019 |
%* |
2019 - 2020 |
%* |
2020 - 2021 |
%* |
2021 - 2022 |
|
Within 15 days |
- |
- |
1 |
50% |
3 |
60% |
- |
- |
Over 15 days |
- |
- |
1 |
50% |
1 |
20% |
- |
- |
Not Pursued |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
20% |
1 |
100% |
TOTAL |
- |
- |
2 |
|
5 |
|
1 |
|
Stage Three Outcomes
|
2018 - 2019 |
%* |
2019 - 2020 |
%* |
2020 - 2021 |
%* |
2021 - 2022 |
|
Upheld |
- |
- |
1 |
50% |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
Partially Upheld |
- |
- |
1 |
50% |
4 |
80% |
- |
1 |
Not Upheld |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
1 |
Not Pursued |
- |
- |
- |
|
1 |
20% |
1 |
100% |
No response sent |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ongoing |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
TOTAL |
- |
- |
2 |
|
5 |
|
1 |
|
In addition to the information given above for complaints made through the children’s’ social care complaints procedure, 1 complaint was received as a 4cs corporate grade one and three as a corporate grade 2. Complaints are dealt with under the corporate procedure when the complainant is not complaining with the consent of the customer, or it is considered they are not complaining in the customer’s best interest.
18 Percentage escalation
The following table indicates how many complaints in children’s services have been escalated. By measuring these figures as a percentage, we can gauge the implied customer satisfaction levels.
Percentage escalation
|
Number |
% Escalated to next stage |
% Implied customer satisfaction |
Stage 1 to Stage 2 |
2 of 31 (1 was from previous reporting period) |
6% |
94% |
Stage 2 to Stage 3 |
0 of 1(the stage 2 was from the previous reporting period |
0% |
100% |
It is important to note that whilst only a small number of complaints have escalated in this reporting period, the implied customer satisfaction needs to be considered alongside the next reporting period.
19 Equalities Monitoring Information
Following the guidance produced by the Department of Health and the Department for Education and Skills, we must seek to identify who is making complaints to get a greater understanding of them. The following information was provided:
Gender
|
2017 - 2018 |
2018 – 2019 |
2019 - 2020 |
2020 - 2021 |
2021 - 2022 |
Male |
10 |
15 |
17 |
24 |
14 |
Female |
25 |
26 |
64 |
29 |
27 |
Male & Female |
5 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
Not stated |
- |
44 |
0 |
55 |
42 |
20 Who made the complaints
· 5 complaints were made by a child or young person via an advocate.
· 1 complaint was made by family or friends on behalf of a child or young person.
· 36 complaints were made by adults about the service provided to them.
The CGOM is aware most complaints about Children’s Services are not made by children or young people receiving a service. To ensure that children are aware of and are supported to use the complaints and feedback procedure, the team works closely with the Children’s Rights team and where appropriate, other support and advocacy services and others making a complaint on behalf of a child or young person.
The council has a statutory obligation to offer advocacy support to any child or young person making a complaint and the Children’s Rights team make people aware of the options available for raising comments, concerns, complaints, and compliments and provide advocacy support to assist with this where requested.
The CGT are also available to attend meetings with staff members, children, and young people and on occasions foster carers to raise awareness of and understanding about how people can use the procedure.
21 Costs and Payments
The council has an obligation to ensure independence in the children’s social care complaints procedure. This includes a requirement for:
· A person independent of the council to oversee all complaints at stage two made by children and young people.
· To ensure the investigator at stage two has not had any involvement in the complaint or line management responsibility for the services being complained about.
· To have a panel of 3 independent people at stage three.
These costs can be found in the section 6.
In addition to this the council provides financial recompense if, after a complaint has been investigated or as part of an LGSCO’s investigation, it is concluded that:
· the LGSCO would find that there has been maladministration by the council causing injustice to the complainant; and
· the LGSCO would recommend that financial recompense should therefore be paid to the complainant.
Details of payments:
Delays in responding to stage 2 complaint and time and trouble having to pursue to Ombudsman. Time and trouble of having to pursue a complaint to stage 3 |
£100.00 |
Total |
£100.00 |
22 Alternative Dispute Resolution
It is important to note that the Department for Education and Skills Guidance makes it clear that nothing in the procedure should preclude Alternative Dispute Resolution and that if agreed by both complainant and the CGOM, the council should explore this option.
Possible alternatives which may be considered by the CGOM include mediation, the opportunity to meet with senior managers, or the possibility of contributing to the review of policies and procedures.
23 Learning Lessons/Practice Improvements
The council is always happy to consider appropriate ways of resolving a customer’s complaint. Some of the types of action the council has undertaken to resolve complaints have been issuing apologies, meeting with customers to hear their concerns and suggestions for improvements and putting these improvements into place. This has been particularly relevant in the case of communicating effectively with customers and putting strategies into place to ensure that people are kept up to date. The council also offers a re-assessment of needs where possible, to ensure that nothing has been missed or that circumstances have not changed.
Complaints provide senior managers with useful information in respect of the way that services are delivered. The consideration of complaints has included the agreement to undertake the following actions, in addition to apologies and financial recompense:
· Reminder to all staff of the importance of providing contact details to wider family members who are supportive of parents involved with Children Social Services, and the importance of recording the views of family members.
· Held a lesson learned exercise for all frontline staff, to ensure that children in social care are provided with the necessary information and support when moving from children services to adult social care especially where issues arise in respect of allocation of social workers and drift is experienced.
· Met with family to give assurances that their concerns have been heard.
· Developed a communication plan with details about what can and what can't be shared.
· Reminder to staff of the importance of sharing minutes of core group and case conference minutes with parents and carers in a timely manner.
· Review of case file quality assurance procedures to ensure statutory social worker visits and diary notes to looked after or Child Protection casework is carried out and recorded correctly.
· Development of a Pathway Plan
· Reminder about the importance of good communication
Annual Adult Social Care Complaints Report
April 2021 to March 2022
24 Context
This report provides information about complaints made during the twelve months between 1st April 2021 and 31st March 2022 for adults under the Local Authority Social Services and National Health Service Complaints (England) Regulations 2009.
It is noted that several complaints related to delays and errors relating to assessments, reviews and care provision and charges.
Whilst there have not been many complaints about transition arrangements for people moving from children to adult services, the CGOM is aware of the concern, upset and frustration for complainants, these will cause. This is particularly the case where complaints have needed to be escalated to the LGSCO to be resolved. One complaint from this reporting period needed to be escalated to the LGSCO, the outcome will be included in the next reporting period (April 2022 – March 2023). However, this was upheld by the LGSCO. The Corporate Director of Adult Social Care and Integration is aware of this and is working to improve transitions planning and will liaise with managers in children’s services as part of this work.
All timescales contained within this report are for working days. The structures for reporting have changed and are reflected in the reporting for adult service as shown in the below tables.
In addition, the numbers of compliments are also recorded were:
|
18/19 |
19/20 |
20/21 |
21/22 |
Be Independent |
- |
1 |
4 |
1 |
Commissioning & Contract Management |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
Community Provision |
7 |
22 |
10 |
6 |
Joint Commissioning |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Assessment |
16 |
10 |
9 |
- |
Care Homes |
9 |
6 |
5 |
- |
Mental health Safeguarding & DOLS |
4 |
3 |
19 |
18 |
Learning Disability |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
Older People |
- |
- |
- |
11 |
The CGT are aware that many more compliments are received and actively work to encourage staff and teams to forward these to ensure they are recorded. This is to ensure that we can provide a true picture of our customers’ experiences of the services they receive.
The compliments received included:
· Thank you for assistance with process and support
· thank you for your help with a housing application you were very helpful
· Doing a marvellous job
· Thank you for efforts regarding breakdown cost
· Thank you for providing excellent support and been an absolute marvel
· really appreciate social worker’s support
· Helpful, clear, and thorough in how dealt with the issues
· Really supportive, has been reliable and easy to communicate with
· Thank you very much for all the care and attention
· Thanks to Be Independent for call out services.
· Thanks for help to assist relative to stay at home for so long and the peace of mind it has given
· Thanks for being kind, caring, friendly, efficient, and professional, help has improved many lives
· Thank you for help with shopping service, its marvellous and without this, does not know how they would have managed
The legislation makes it clear that people should be able to provide feedback and have this responded to without this being seen as a complaint. Therefore concerns, comments and requests are also logged.
Number of Concerns, Comments and Requests received
|
18/19 |
19/20 |
20/21 |
21/22 |
Be Independent |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
Commissioning & Contract Management |
4 |
2 |
2 |
- |
Commissioning Provision |
- |
- |
2
|
- |
Joint Commissioning |
- |
- |
- |
|
Assessment |
3 |
10 |
2 |
- |
Care Homes |
5 |
3 |
2 |
- |
Community Provision |
8 |
8 |
3 |
7 |
Mental health Safeguarding & DOLS |
11 |
9 |
5 |
9 |
Learning Disability |
|
|
|
1 |
Older People |
|
|
|
5 |
25 Who can make a Complaint?
Someone who:
· The local authority has a power or duty to provide or secure the provision of a social service for him/her and
· His/her need for such a service has (by whatever means) come to the attention of the Authority.
This definition also applies to a person acting on behalf of someone who meets the above requirements.
A complaint can be made by a representative where the CGOM receives permission from the eligible person, usually in writing, giving their permission for the representative to make the complaint on their behalf. A representative will also be able to make a complaint where the eligible person is not capable of making the complaint themselves, this includes when they have died.
The CGOM will decide if a person is suitable to act as a representative, if it is decided they are not acting in the eligible person’s best interests, they will inform them in writing of the reasons for this.
If a customer is not eligible under the terms of the Act, they will always be able to have their complaint looked at under the council’s 4Cs corporate complaints procedure.
26 Grading of Complaints
The Department of Health designed the following tool to assess the seriousness of complaints and decide the relevant action:
Step 1: Decide how serious the issue is
Seriousness |
Description |
Low |
Unsatisfactory service or experience not directly related to care. No impact or risk to provision of care. OR Unsatisfactory service or experience related to care, usually a single resolvable issue. Minimal impact and relative minimal risk to the provision of care or the service. No real risk of litigation. |
Medium |
Service or experience below reasonable expectations in several ways, but not causing lasting problems. Has potential to impact on service provision. Some potential for litigation. |
High |
Significant issues regarding standards, quality of care and safeguarding of or denial of rights. Complaints with clear quality assurance or risk management issues that may cause lasting problems for the organisation, and so require investigation. Possibility of litigation and adverse local publicity. OR Serious issues that may cause long-term damage, such as grossly substandard care, professional misconduct, or death. Will require immediate and in-depth investigation. May involve serious safety issues. A high probability of litigation and strong possibility of adverse national publicity. |
Step 2: Decide how likely the issue is to recur
Likelihood |
Description |
Rare |
Isolated or ‘one off’ – slight or vague connection to service provision. |
Unlikely |
Rare – unusual but may have happened before. |
Possible |
Happens from time to time – not frequently or regularly. |
Likely |
Will probably occur several times a year. |
Almost certain |
Recurring and frequent, predictable. |
Step 3: How to categorise the risk
Seriousness |
Likelihood of recurrence |
||||
|
Rare |
Unlikely |
Possible |
Likely |
Almost Certain |
Low |
Low |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderate |
|
|
|
Medium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
|
High |
|
|
|
Extreme |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CGT grades the complaints as:
Low = Green - Can be resolved locally
Medium = Amber - Needs a response from the Corporate Director
High = Red - Needs a response from the Corporate Director
Complainants are contacted by the CGT to design a complaints plan and agree an appropriate response timescale. This is often done through an acknowledgment letter requesting the complainant to confirm the council’s understanding of the complaint and the timescale for response.
Following the response, a complainant can ask the Local Government and Social care Ombudsman (LGSCO) to investigate if they remain dissatisfied.
27 Activity
The CGT recorded 42 complaints under the adult social care procedure during the year 2021 – 2022, compared with a total of 28 the previous year.
In addition to the above there were three grade 1 and two grade 2 complaints about adult social care services made under the corporate 4Cs procedure.
Complaints are dealt with under the corporate 4Cs procedure when the complainant is not complaining with the consent of the customer, or it may be considered they are not complaining in the customer’s best interest.
28 Comparison with the preceding year
The figures show an increase in the number of complaints received in
2021 – 2022 through the adults’ social care procedures.
29 Outcomes of complaints:
|
2017 - 2018 |
2018 - 2019 |
2019 - 2020 |
2020 – 2021 |
2021 - 2022 |
Upheld |
4 |
4 |
15 |
6 |
7 |
Partly upheld |
8 |
11 |
12 |
6 |
13 |
Not upheld |
6 |
5 |
16 |
13 |
17 |
Not proved |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Not pursued |
1 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
No response |
1 |
0 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
Ongoing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total |
21 |
21 |
53 |
28 |
42 |
30 Response Times
A key requirement of the reform of complaints procedures is the importance of informing service users of the outcome of their complaints, in an appropriate time frame.
The Department of Health guidance on deciding how long it should take to respond to a complaint states:
“If someone makes a complaint, your organisation has to acknowledge it within three working days. The person making the complaint will want to know what is being done – and when. However, accurately gauging how long an issue may take to resolve can be difficult, especially if it is a complex matter involving more than one person or organisation. To help judge how long a complaint might take to resolve, it is important to:
• address the concerns raised as quickly as possible
• stay in regular contact with whoever has complained to update them on progress
• stick to any agreements you make – and, if for any reason you can’t, explain why.
It is good practice to review any case lasting more than six months, to ensure everything is being done to resolve it.”
Details of Complaints
31 Green Complaints
There were 34 complaints graded as Green in adult services compared to 23 last year.
It is however noted 4 complaints received no response and the CGT are continuing to work with managers to ensure all complaints receive a response.
Complaints graded at this level were categorised as follows:
BI = Be Independent
CCM = Commissioning & Contract Management
Commis = Commissioning Provision
Provision
JC = Joint Commissioning
A = Assessment
CH = Care Homes
Com = Community Provision
Provision
MH/S/DOLS = Mental health Safeguarding & DOLS
LD = Learning Disability
OP = Older People
Green Theme of complaint
|
BI |
CCM |
Commis Provision
|
JC |
A |
CH |
Com Provision |
MH S DOLS |
LD |
OP |
Total |
Attitude of staff |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Disagree with Policy |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Disagree with Assessment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
5 |
3 |
- |
9 |
Discrimination |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Inappropriate Action |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
7 |
Lack of Action |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
9 |
Quality of Advice/ Communication |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
9 |
TOTAL |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
34 |
It is not uncommon for the category disagree with assessment to receive the most complaints. It is also noted many complaints relate to the quality of advice or communication. It is considered this is because of the work by the CGT to more accurately identify when complaints have arisen through lack of contact or poor quality of communication.
It is also noted that 4 complaints did not receive any response, which is an increase from 3 in the last reporting period. This is something which will continue to be brought to the attention of senior managers to assist with improving this for future complaints.
Green Response Times
|
BI |
CCM |
Commis Provision
|
JC |
A |
CH |
Com Provision |
MH S DOLS |
LD |
OP |
Total |
Within 10 days |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
9 |
1 |
5 |
19 |
Within 25 days |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
Over 25 days |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
- |
3 |
6 |
Not Pursued |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
TOTAL |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
16 |
2 |
11 |
34 |
It is important to remember that the legislation and guidance for adults does not prescribe actual timescales for responses. However, we do manage and monitor performance in this area using best practice across the different complaints’ legislation and guidance. The above table highlights that we are responding to most complaints at this stage within the shortest timescale. However, it is noted that 4 complaints did not receive a response.
Green Outcomes
|
BI |
CCM |
Commis Provision
|
JC |
A |
CH |
Com Provision |
MH S DOLS |
LD |
OP |
Total |
Upheld |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
3 |
- |
5 |
Partially Upheld |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
8 |
1 |
2 |
12 |
Not Upheld |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
12 |
No Response |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
- |
2 |
4 |
Not Pursued |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
TOTAL |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
34 |
32 Amber Complaints
There were 5 complaints graded as Amber in adult services the same number as for last year.
Amber Theme of Complaint
|
BI |
CCM |
Commis Provision
|
JC |
A |
CH |
Com Provision |
MH S DOLS |
LD |
OP |
Total |
Attitude of staff |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Disagree with Policy |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Disagree with Assessment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
Discrimination |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Inappropriate Action |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
1 |
2 |
Lack of Action |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
Quality of Advice/Communication |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
TOTAL |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
1 |
5 |
Amber Response Times
|
BI |
CCM |
Commis Provision
|
JC |
A |
CH |
Com Provision |
MH S DOLS |
LD |
OP |
Total |
Within 25days |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
- |
1 |
3 |
Within 65 days |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
Over timescale |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
Not Pursued |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
TOTAL |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
1 |
5 |
Amber Outcomes
|
BI |
CCM |
Commis Provision
|
JC |
A |
CH |
Com Provision |
MH S DOLS |
LD |
OP |
Total |
Upheld |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
Partially Upheld |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
Not Upheld |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
- |
- |
3 |
No Response |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Not Pursued |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
TOTAL |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
1 |
5 |
33 Red Complaints
There were 3 complaints graded Red in adult services, compared to 0 last year.
Red Theme of Complaint
|
BI |
CCM |
Commis Provision
|
JC |
A |
CH |
Com Provision |
MH S DOLS |
LD |
OP |
Total |
Attitude of staff |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Disagree with Policy |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Disagree with Assessment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
Discrimination |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Inappropriate Action |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Lack of Action |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
Quality of Advice/Communication |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
TOTAL |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
- |
- |
3 |
Red Response Times
|
BI |
CCM |
Commis Provision
|
JC |
A |
CH |
Com Provision |
MH S DOLS |
LD |
OP |
Total |
Within 25days |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
2 |
Within 65 days |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
Over timescale |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Not Pursued |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
TOTAL |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
- |
- |
3 |
Red Outcomes
|
BI |
CCM |
Commis Provision
|
JC |
A |
CH |
Com Provision |
MH S DOLS |
LD |
OP |
Total |
Upheld |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
Partially Upheld |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Not Upheld |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
2 |
No Response |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Not Pursued |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
TOTAL |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
- |
- |
3 |
34 Equalities Monitoring Information
Following the guidance and best practice, it is important to understand who is making complaints and so we seek to identify who is making complaints. Only the following information was provided:
Gender
Male: 14
Female: 28
Male and Female: 0
35 Who made the complaints
· 24 complaints were received directly from a customer
· 15 complaints were made by a family member
· 3 complaints were made by an advocate
36 Payments
The council provides financial recompense if, after a complaint has been investigated or as part of an LGSCO’s investigation, it is concluded that the LGSCO would find that there has been maladministration by the council causing injustice to the complainant with a recommendation that financial recompense should therefore be paid to the complainant.
Detail of payments made
Repayment of 12-week disregard costs |
£761.01 |
Reimbursement and waive of care costs and time and trouble |
£1513.77 |
Refund of overpaid care charges |
£5886.00 |
Removed from invoice for care costs |
£489.58 |
Total |
£8650.36 |
37 Alternative Dispute Resolution
It is important to note that the complaints regulations and guidance for adult social care complaints are that a plan needs to be agreed between the complainant and the CGOM about how the complaint will be dealt with and responded to, what outcomes are wanted and what can be realistically achieved.
Possible alternatives which may be considered by the CGOM include mediation, the opportunity to meet with senior managers, or the possibility of contributing to the review of policies and procedures.
38 Complaints dealt with by the local authority and NHS Bodies
The CGT works with contracted agencies and statutory agencies to identify the main themes concerned in a complaint. Informal agreements are in place to provide the customer with a co-ordinated response with the agency responsible for the provision of the main areas of complaint taking the lead with co-operation from the other agencies as required.
39 Learning Lessons/Practice Improvements
The council is always happy to consider appropriate ways of resolving a customer’s complaint including meeting with customers to hear their concerns and suggestions for improvements and putting these improvements into place.
The council also offers a re-assessment of needs where possible, to ensure that nothing has been missed or that circumstances have not changed.
Complaints provide senior managers with useful information in respect of the way that services are delivered, so that improvements can be made. The complaints manager is continuing to encourage work with teams across the council to ensure learning from complaints is leading to improvements in services and that evidence of actions being completed are provided. Some of the actions which have been logged include the following, in addition to apologies and financial recompense:
· Introduction of an Autism training course for all social care staff working with customers on the Autistic Spectrum.
· Change of worker
· Reminder to staff of policy and procedure regarding the expectations of their professional engagement with customers and carers.
· Allocation of a Review Manager to undertake the tasks required to understand the history of changes to the funded services because of the Covid-19 pandemic, accompanied by a reassessment of financial contributions.
· Review and confirm that systems are in place to monitor performance where concerns have been identified
40 Public Health
Complaints about services related to the functions of Public Health also fall under the legislation “Local Authority Social Services and National Health Service Complaints (England) Regulations 2009” and are therefore dealt with in the same way as those for adult social care services.
Compliments 0
Comments 6
Concerns 1
4cs Corporate complaint at grade two 1
Annual Corporate Complaints Procedure Report
April 2021 to March 2022
41 Context
This is the sixth year we have produced an annual report for complaints considered under the Corporate Complaints Procedure. This procedure covers all complaints about services provided by the council where no statutory procedure exists.
There were 627 complaints at grade 1 in this reporting period compared with 502 last year.
The number of comments logged were 1326 compared to 1609 last year.
It is therefore considered the arrangements under the 4Cs procedure, introduced in the previous reporting period, and implemented in full in this period are showing consistent results in the assessment and grading of customer complaints and feedback.
We are pleased the implementation of the new procedure, has resulted in a significant reduction in the number of complaints which did not receive a response, as well as an improvement in the timescales for response.
We are continuing to work to ensure that every complaint is responded to. Those that did not receive a response were because of oversights. Additional measures have been implemented to reduce the risk of this reoccurring.
All timescales contained within this report are for working days.
In addition, the numbers of compliments are also recorded, and these are shown below for the directorates as they were known during the reporting period.
Number of Compliments Received
Directorate |
2019 – 2020 |
2020 - 2021 |
Directorate |
2021 -2022 |
CCS |
51 |
34 |
Corporate Services |
9 |
CEC |
10 |
5 |
Customer & Communities |
25 |
EAP |
82 |
79 |
People |
6 |
HHASC |
63 |
64 |
Place |
137 |
TOTAL |
206 |
182 |
TOTAL |
177 |
The CGT are aware that many more compliments are received and actively work to encourage staff and teams to forward these to ensure they are recorded. This is to ensure we can provide a true picture of our customers’ experiences of the services they receive.
The compliments received included thanks for:
· Man cutting grass verges is doing a great job
· The waste team are always amazing - waving to make sure the lorry is seen in action
· Thanks to the bin men for rescuing a hedgehog
· Thank you to our recycling crew who have improved their handling of our collections
· Thank you assisted collection was collected after reporting
· Poo bins are plentiful emptied regularly. Thank you for this excellent service
· Thanks for medical waste collection
· Thanks to licensing staff, you made the process seamless
· Thanks to housing maintenance and repairs really delighted with the workmanship and our service altogether.
· Thank you to the team who came out to sort out a broken guttering down fall pipe
· Repair man was very polite
· Thanks to Gas repair staff on quick response and respect they showed customer
· Thanks to Housing Options officer for her help and assistance
· Thanks to Housing Options staff you've been amazing through out
· Thank you to housing option team for providing help and advice
· Thank you to Housing Adaptations team for help with adaptation
· Thank you card for solution to noise issues
· Thanks to NEO team for help with noise complaints
· Thank you very much for all your help with my parking
· To parking staff, help was invaluable
· The car park attendant at Coppergate was really helpful
· To Registrars a wonderful day. We both enjoyed every moment, and the service was truly exceptional.
· Newly widened cycle/ footpath Scarborough Bridge has made such a difference
· Thanks for bike paths being gritted
· Gardeners cutting the grass in her area are doing a fabulous job, thank you
· Thank you to the department planting the wildflower beds along the central reservation of the Hull Road
· Thanks to council tax staff for being professional and patient making a positive experience.
· Thanks for helping businesses out by channelling the grant and communicating so efficiently
· Thanks for sorting out complaint so promptly
· Thank you for how complaint was handled
· Thank you noise team or amazing quick and efficient service
· Thank you to city centre street cleaner
· Thanks to street cleaner
· Thank you for clearing the blocked drains in Boroughbridge Road
· Thanks to streetlighting team for fixing an issue quickly
· Thanks for changing streetlight
· Thank to customer services for help renewing blue badge
The good practice from the statutory processes is clear that people should be able to provide feedback and have this responded to without this being seen as a complaint. Therefore concerns, comments and requests are also logged in the 4Cs corporate procedure, and these are shown below:
Number of Concerns, Comments and Requests
Directorate |
2019 - 2020 |
2020 - 2021 |
Directorate |
2021 - 2022 |
CCS |
179 |
309 |
Corporate Services |
58 |
CEC |
19 |
9 |
Customer & Communities |
203 |
EAP |
559 |
1056 |
People |
3 |
HHASC |
252 |
235 |
Place |
1062 |
TOTAL |
1,009 |
1609 |
TOTAL |
1326 |
42 Who can make a Complaint?
The council’s corporate complaint policy and procedures states we will accept complaints from
· a member of public or anyone acting on behalf of a customer with the proper authority and consent,
And using any of the following contact methods:
• in person
• by phone
• by letter
• by email
• through our website. www.york.gov.uk
43 Grading of Complaints
The CGT assess the appropriate stage to investigate a complaint or referral to the relevant Ombudsman, taking account of issues such as:
· risk to the customer and the authority
· severity of the risk
· whether the issues in question are a one off, are a reoccurrence and likelihood of reoccurrence.
44 Response Times
It is considered good practice that a key requirement of a complaint procedure is the importance of informing service users of the outcome of their complaints in an appropriate time frame.
The new 4cs process for investigating and responding to corporate complaints was implemented at the beginning of this reporting period.
This changed the process from 3 stages to 2 grades.
The timescales have been changed to:
· Grade One - 20 working days (10 for Housing Complaints in line with the Housing Ombudsman guidance)
· Grade Two - 30 working days (20 for Housing Complaints in line with the Housing Ombudsman guidance)
In addition to the above all complaints under the 4Cs are investigated and responded to by the CGT.
Details of complaints
45 Grade One Complaints
Primary theme by directorate
2020-2021
|
Staff attitude |
Disagree with assess - ment |
Disagree with policy |
Discrimination |
Inapprop riate action |
Lack of action |
Quality of advice, communication/work |
TOTAL |
CCS |
2 |
36 |
12 |
- |
10 |
12 |
16 |
88 |
CEC |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
EAP |
4 |
18 |
44 |
- |
64 |
140 |
29 |
299 |
HHASC |
3 |
16 |
7 |
2 |
11 |
61 |
11 |
111 |
Total |
9 |
71 |
63 |
2 |
86 |
214 |
57 |
502 |
2021-2022
|
Staff attitude |
Disagree with assess - ment |
Disagree with policy |
Discrimination |
Inapprop riate action |
Lack of action |
Quality of advice, communication/work |
TOTAL |
Corporate Services |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
2 |
7 |
Customer & Communities |
1 |
20 |
12 |
- |
16 |
43 |
10 |
102 |
People |
- |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
3 |
Place |
4 |
38 |
79 |
1 |
54 |
298 |
41 |
515 |
Total |
5 |
60 |
91 |
1 |
70 |
347 |
53 |
627 |
Outcome by directorate
2020-2021
|
Upheld |
Not upheld |
Partly upheld |
Not pursued |
No response |
%* |
Not Proven |
TOTAL |
CCS |
20 |
43 |
16 |
4 |
5 |
63 |
- |
88 |
CEC |
2 |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
EAP |
145 |
79 |
43 |
8 |
20 |
7% |
4 |
299 |
HHASC |
20 |
32 |
37 |
12 |
9 |
8% |
1 |
111 |
Total |
187 |
155 |
97 |
24 |
34 |
7% |
5 |
502 |
2021-2022
|
upheld |
Not upheld |
Partly upheld |
Not pursued |
No response |
%* |
Not proven |
TOTAL |
Corporate Services |
1 |
2 |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
7 |
Customer & Communities |
34 |
45 |
14 |
9 |
- |
- |
- |
102 |
People |
2 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
Place |
191 |
162 |
100 |
52 |
2 |
- |
8 |
515 |
Total |
228 |
209 |
117 |
62 |
2 |
- |
9 |
627 |
%* are rounded up or down to the nearest whole number
Responding in time performance by directorate
2020-2021
|
In time |
%* |
Out of time |
%* |
Not pursued |
%* |
TOTAL |
CCS |
76 |
86% |
8 |
9% |
4 |
5% |
88 |
CEC |
2 |
50% |
2 |
50% |
- |
- |
4 |
EAP |
250 |
84% |
41 |
14% |
8 |
3% |
299 |
HHASC |
71 |
64% |
28 |
25% |
12 |
11% |
111 |
Total |
399 |
79% |
79 |
16% |
24 |
5% |
502 |
2021-2022
|
In time |
%* |
Out of time |
%* |
Not pursued |
%* |
TOTAL |
Corporate Service |
5 |
71% |
2 |
29% |
- |
- |
7 |
Customers & Communities |
85 |
83% |
8 |
8% |
9 |
9% |
102 |
People |
1 |
33% |
1 |
33% |
1 |
33% |
3 |
Place |
353 |
69% |
108 |
21% |
54 |
10% |
515 |
Total |
444 |
71% |
119 |
19% |
64 |
10% |
627 |
%* are rounded up or down to the nearest whole number
46 Grade Two Complaints
2020-2021
|
Staff attitude |
Disagree with assess- ment |
Disagree with policy |
Discrimination |
Inappropriate action |
Lack of action |
Quality of advice, communication/ work |
TOTAL |
CCS |
- |
4 |
4 |
- |
4 |
3 |
1 |
16 |
CEC |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
EAP |
- |
10 |
5 |
- |
22 |
49 |
4 |
90 |
HHASC |
- |
3 |
1 |
- |
3 |
12 |
1 |
20 |
TOTAL |
|
17 |
10 |
|
29 |
64 |
6 |
126 |
2021-2022
|
Staff attitude |
Disagree with assess - ment |
Disagree with policy |
Discrimination |
Inapprop riate action |
Lack of action |
Quality of advice, communication/work |
TOTAL |
Corporate Services |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
Customer & Communities |
1 |
9 |
5 |
- |
7 |
3 |
- |
25 |
People |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
1 |
Place |
- |
24 |
501 |
- |
54 |
235 |
24 |
838 |
Total |
1 |
33 |
506 |
- |
62 |
239 |
24 |
865 |
Outcome by directorate
2019-2020
2020-2021
|
Upheld |
Not upheld |
Partly upheld |
Not pursued |
No response |
%* |
Not Proven |
TOTAL |
CCS |
2 |
8 |
3 |
- |
3 |
19% |
- |
16 |
CEC |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
EAP |
46 |
19 |
14 |
3 |
8 |
9% |
- |
90 |
HHASC |
2 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
30% |
- |
20 |
Total |
50 |
33 |
22 |
4 |
17 |
13% |
- |
126 |
2021-2022
|
upheld |
Not upheld |
Partly upheld |
Not pursued |
No response |
%* |
Not proven |
TOTAL |
Corporate Services |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
100% |
- |
1 |
Customer & Communities |
4 |
13 |
7 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
25 |
People |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
Place |
657 |
102 |
33 |
44 |
2 |
0.2% |
- |
838 |
Total |
661 |
115 |
41 |
45 |
3 |
0.3% |
- |
865 |
Responding in time performance by directorate
2020-2021
|
In time |
%* |
Out of time |
%* |
Not pursued |
%* |
TOTAL |
CCS |
11 |
69% |
5 |
31% |
- |
- |
16 |
CEC |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
EAP |
65 |
72& |
22 |
24% |
3 |
3% |
90 |
HHASC |
6 |
30% |
13 |
65% |
1 |
5% |
20 |
Total |
82 |
65% |
40 |
32% |
4 |
3% |
126 |
2021-2022
|
In time |
%* |
Out of time |
%* |
Not pursued |
%* |
TOTAL |
Corporate Service |
- |
- |
1 |
100% |
- |
- |
1 |
Customers & Communities |
20 |
80% |
5 |
20% |
- |
- |
25 |
People |
- |
- |
1 |
100% |
- |
- |
1 |
Place |
685 |
82% |
109 |
13% |
44 |
5% |
838 |
Total |
705 |
82% |
116 |
13% |
44 |
5% |
865 |
%* are rounded up or down to the nearest whole number
48 Learning Lessons/Practice Improvements
The council is always happy to consider appropriate ways of resolving a customer’s complaint including meeting with customers to hear their concerns and suggestions for improvements and putting these improvements into place.
Most complaints logged at grade 2 as a disagreement with policy, are about the current policy of advising residents that the council will not pay for a replacement bin, when they report their bin has been damaged or gone missing after being collected.
Since the implementation of the 4Cs procedures, the CGT has worked with managers in waste services, which has identified that in many cases, for damaged bins, it has been caused by the wagons during emptying.
It also identified that in many cases, lost bins occurred because of bins falling into the wagon.
The current waste services policy means that when bins are reported damaged or lost, residents are told they must pay for a replacement. This means residents either must pay for a replacement or make a complaint to reach an appropriate resolution.
This creates additional time and trouble for members of the public, or costs for those who feel unable or unwilling to make a complaint. This is in addition to the additional work needed by council officers to respond to and resolve the complaints.
Most complaints about a lack of action relate to repeated failures with waste collections including assisted waste collections. It has been identified there were some difficulties with providing and using the technology for crew information and monitoring. Managers and staff in waste services have been working to resolve and improve the ability to identify and resolve problems and ensure collections take place appropriately.
Complaints provide senior managers with useful information in respect of the way that services are delivered, so that improvements can be made. The CGT is working with teams across the council to ensure learning from complaints is leading to improvements in services and that evidence of actions being completed are provided. In addition to the above, some of the actions which have been logged include the following, in addition to apologies and financial recompense.
· The parking team to check the counters on the carparks on a quarterly basis
· Crew reminders and monitoring
· Reminders to staff about access arrangements for assisted waste collections
· Review of procedures
· Repairs completed
· Plans for frequency of updates and communication
As the council is committed to transparency and where there is no conflict or risk to the complainant’s interest or could compromise their anonymity, we have included the summary details of the LGSCO findings at Annex 1.
This is like how the LGSCO determines which decisions to publish. For the decisions they do publish, they do not use real names. You can search the LGSCO’s published decisions on the following link:
http://www.lgo.org.uk/decisions
49 Payments
The council provides financial recompense if, after a complaint has been investigated or as part of an LGSCO’s or HOS investigation, it is concluded that the LGSCO or HOS would find that there has been maladministration by the council causing injustice to the complainant; and would recommend that financial recompense should therefore be paid to the complainant.
Details of payments were made
To acknowledge the lost opportunity and avoidable time, trouble, and inconvenience – Ombudsman action |
£300.00 |
For the avoidable distress the failures caused. This includes the anxiety suffered, the upset, the upheaval, the frustration, the inconvenience, and the impact on her mental health; and Pay a contribution of towards the overall cost incurred when moving and preparing home. For the avoidable distress the failures caused which have resulted in having to move from property 3 to another property. Subject to providing satisfactory receipts, and will try to arrange for a community-based organisation to do the work Subject to her providing satisfactory receipts contribution towards moving costs For any improvement works to the existing fence, which already meets its empty property standard, subject to providing satisfactory receipts. Ombudsman actions |
£1,500
£1,293.60
£250
Up to £1,000
Up to £150
Up to £1,200 |
The Council failed to collect Mr B’s bulky waste – Ombudsman action |
£100.00 |
The Council is at fault for its failure to progress an application to stop up a section of verge on a road – Ombudsman action |
£500.00 |
An unlicensed House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) – Ombudsman action |
£100.00 |
To acknowledge its repeated failure to collect her bins and its failure to effectively monitor her bin collection as promised – Ombudsman action |
£200.00 |
Recompense for additional heating costs – Housing Ombudsman action |
£150.00 |
Reimburse cost of items removed. – complaint action |
£50.00 |
Council failure regarding privacy in the decision notice for a planning application. |
£100.00 |
Delays in updated HMO database – council agreed remedy to Ombudsman |
£100.00 |
TOTAL |
£6993.00 |
50 Alternative Dispute Resolution
Based on the good practice guidance in the statutory complaints’ procedures, the council also considers whether there would be an appropriate alternative way of resolving complaints, in the corporate procedure, rather than completing an investigation.
Possible alternatives which may be considered by the Corporate Governance Operational Manager include mediation, the opportunity to meet with senior managers, or the possibility of contributing to the review of policies and procedures.
Annex 1 Complaints received by the LGSCO
|
Complaints Decided by the LGSCO
Category |
Decided |
Decision |
Decision Reason |
Remedy |
Service improvement recommendations |
Housing |
22/04/2021 |
Upheld |
mal & inj |
Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss, Procedure, or policy change/review, provide services to person affected |
The Council agreed to carry out a review of its policies and procedures to improve: its systems and procedures to identify potential problems of perpetrators moving close to their victims; its consideration of discretion to prevent moves involving perpetrators who might end up living near their victims; its ability to be more proactive when known perpetrators do end up living close to victims; its record keeping; its investigation of reports of harassment; its consideration of discretion when rehousing applicants next door to tenants with violence and behavioural issues; its consideration of human rights. |
Highways & Transport |
30/11/2021 |
Upheld |
mal & inj |
Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, new appeal/review, or reconsidered decision |
|
Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation |
18/06/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged injustice |
|
|
Other |
27/08/2021 |
Incomplete/Invalid |
Insufficient information to proceed and PA advised |
|
|
Planning & Development |
24/05/2021 |
Upheld |
mal & inj |
Apology, provide information/advice to person affected, Provide training and/or guidance |
The Council will ensure it documents its decision-making process when deciding to close a case (for example a contemporaneous note if the decision arises from a group discussion). |
Planning & Development |
24/09/2021 |
Upheld |
mal no inj |
|
|
Adult Care Services |
30/06/2021 |
Upheld |
mal & inj |
Apology |
|
Planning & Development |
20/07/2021 |
Upheld |
mal & inj |
Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss |
|
Highways & Transport |
28/02/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure |
|
|
Corporate & Other Services |
15/06/2021 |
Upheld |
mal no inj |
|
|
Adult Care Services |
12/07/2021 |
Upheld |
mal & inj - no further action, already remedied |
|
|
Highways & Transport |
19/05/2021 |
Upheld |
mal & inj |
Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, provide information/advice to person affected, Procedure or policy change/review |
The Council agrees to: •Complete a review of its road adoption system. The review should consider how it is kept up to date and accurate. •After completing the review report the findings to Councillors and seek approval for changes and recommendations. •Once the Councillors have made their decision write to Mr B and explain what action it will take and what the timeframe will be for completion. •Provide the Ombudsman with a copy of the review report, agreed actions and timeframe for completion. |
Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation |
17/09/2021 |
Not Upheld |
no mal |
|
|
Housing |
21/06/2021 |
Upheld |
mal & inj |
Apology, New appeal/review, or reconsidered decision, Provide training and/or guidance |
The Council will remind relevant staff to provide clear information in housing register decision letters about how to request a review of the decision. The Council will remind relevant staff to consider whether a complaint should actually be treated as a request for a review of a housing decision so the Council can respond appropriately. |
Adult Care Services |
01/07/2021 |
Upheld |
mal no inj |
|
|
Planning & Development |
11/08/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged injustice |
|
|
Benefits & Tax |
20/04/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged injustice |
|
|
Adult Care Services |
17/11/2021 |
Upheld |
mal & inj |
Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, financial redress: Loss of service |
|
Adult Care Services |
15/12/2021 |
Upheld |
mal & inj |
Apology, Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss |
|
Education & Childrens Services |
26/04/2021 |
Referred for local resolution |
Premature Decision - advice given |
|
|
Planning & Development |
30/04/2021 |
Referred for local resolution |
Premature Decision - advice given |
|
|
Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation |
25/11/2021 |
Upheld |
mal & inj |
Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble |
|
Planning & Development |
18/11/2021 |
Upheld |
mal no inj |
|
|
Adult Care Services |
17/08/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
No worthwhile outcome achievable by investigation |
|
|
Benefits & Tax |
20/07/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
26(6)(a) tribunal Other |
|
|
Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation |
15/07/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
26(6)(c) Court remedy |
|
|
Education & Childrens Services |
27/07/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Sch 5.4 personnel |
|
|
Housing |
09/06/2021 |
Advice given |
Signpost - go to complaint handling |
|
|
Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation |
13/01/2022 |
Upheld |
mal & inj |
Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, provide services to person affected, provide services/information to others affected |
The Council should contact other residents who use the Council’s assisted bin collection service and have complained about missed collections since 1 April 2021. In cases where complaints have continued, the Council should: a) review whether monitoring has failed in their cases as well, and b) consider what steps it should take to acknowledge any distress caused.c) Those residents should be told they can take their case to the Ombudsman if they are unhappy with the Council’s approach. |
Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation |
16/06/2021 |
Referred for local resolution |
Premature Decision - advice given |
|
|
Housing |
16/06/2021 |
Advice given |
Signpost - go to complaint handling |
|
|
Housing |
04/01/2022 |
Upheld |
mal & inj |
Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, Provide training and/or guidance |
• Provide guidance to relevant staff to ensure they understand an RRO can only be applied for within 12 months of a relevant offence being committed. • Remind its staff of the requirement to issue occupiers with a copy of a HAN. Additionally, the communication should cover the requirement to provide notice of an inspection at a property and to inform complainants who raise questions about fire safety that it has arrangements in place with the local fire authority, and not to just direct complainants to the fire service in these circumstances. |
Corporate & Other Services |
22/11/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
26(6)(c) Court remedy |
|
|
Highways & Transport |
07/09/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure |
|
|
Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation |
18/08/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged injustice |
|
|
Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation |
18/08/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged injustice |
|
|
Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation |
05/11/2021 |
Upheld |
Injustice remedied during complaint processes |
|
|
Adult Care Services |
16/09/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
No worthwhile outcome achievable by investigation |
|
|
Planning & Development |
27/07/2021 |
Referred for local resolution |
Premature Decision - advice given |
|
|
Planning & Development |
26/07/2021 |
Referred for local resolution |
Premature Decision - advice given |
|
|
Adult Care Services |
25/11/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
26B (2) not made in 12 months |
|
|
Highways & Transport |
15/09/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure |
|
|
Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation |
18/08/2021 |
Referred for local resolution |
Premature Decision - advice given |
|
|
Highways & Transport |
24/09/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Other reason not to investigate |
|
|
Benefits & Tax |
09/09/2021 |
Referred for local resolution |
Premature Decision - advice given |
|
|
Planning & Development |
13/10/2021 |
Referred for local resolution |
Premature Decision – referred to council |
|
|
Adult Care Services |
16/09/2021 |
Incomplete/Invalid |
Insufficient information to proceed and PA advised |
|
|
Adult Care Services |
22/11/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure |
|
|
Education & Childrens Services |
30/09/2021 |
Referred for local resolution |
Premature Decision - advice given |
|
|
Corporate & Other Services |
02/02/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure |
|
|
Benefits & Tax |
03/03/2022 |
Not Upheld |
no mal |
|
|
Benefits & Tax |
13/10/2021 |
Referred for local resolution |
Premature Decision - advice given |
|
|
Housing |
14/10/2021 |
Advice given |
Signpost - go to complaint handling |
|
|
Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation |
25/02/2022 |
Not Upheld |
No worthwhile outcome achievable by further investigation |
|
|
Benefits & Tax |
24/11/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
No worthwhile outcome achievable by investigation |
|
|
Highways & Transport |
09/12/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
26(6)(a) tribunal Other |
|
|
Benefits & Tax |
13/12/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
26(6)(a) tribunal Other |
|
|
Housing |
18/11/2021 |
Advice given |
Signpost - go to complaint handling |
|
|
Highways & Transport |
24/12/2021 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
26(6)(a) tribunal TPT/PATAS |
|
|
Corporate & Other Services |
21/01/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Other reason not to investigate |
|
|
Highways & Transport |
27/01/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure |
|
|
Planning & Development |
15/02/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure |
|
|
Education & Childrens Services |
04/02/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
26(6)(c) Court remedy |
|
|
Highways & Transport |
14/01/2022 |
Referred for local resolution |
Premature Decision - advice given |
|
|
Highways & Transport |
20/01/2022 |
Referred for local resolution |
Premature Decision - advice given |
|
|
Highways & Transport |
01/03/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure |
|
|
Highways & Transport |
29/03/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure |
|
|
Education & Childrens Services |
17/02/2022 |
Referred for local resolution |
Premature Decision - advice given |
|
|
Education & Childrens Services |
21/03/2022 |
Upheld |
Injustice remedied during LGO consideration |
Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble |
|
Planning & Development |
18/03/2022 |
Closed after initial enquiries |
Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure |
|
|
Highways & Transport |
07/03/2022 |
Referred for local resolution |
Premature Decision - referred to council |
|
|
Abbreviations
Mal – maladministration
Inj – injustice
PA – person affected (customer/complainant)
Rep – representative for the PA
Compliance with Agreed Remedies
Category |
Decided |
Remedy |
Remedy Target Date |
Remedy Achieved Date |
Satisfaction with Compliance |
Housing |
22-Apr-21 |
Apology |
22-Jul-21 |
22-Jul-21 |
Remedy complete and satisfied |
Highways & Transport |
30-Nov-21 |
Apology |
31-Jan-22 |
17-Feb-22 |
Remedy complete and satisfied |
Adult Care Services |
22-Feb-21 |
Apology |
05-Apr-21 |
07-Apr-21 |
Remedy complete and satisfied |
Planning & Development |
24-May-21 |
Apology |
21-Jun-21 |
07-Jul-21 |
Remedy completed late |
Adult Care Services |
30-Jun-21 |
Apology |
28-Jul-21 |
29-Jul-21 |
Remedy complete and satisfied |
Planning & Development |
19-Jul-21 |
Apology |
20-Aug-21 |
14-Sep-21 |
Remedy completed late |
Highways & Transport |
18-May-21 |
Apology |
19-Aug-21 |
08-Sep-21 |
Remedy complete and satisfied |
Housing |
20-Jun-21 |
Apology |
21-Sep-21 |
20-Sep-21 |
Remedy complete and satisfied |
Adult Care Services |
17-Nov-21 |
Apology |
17-Dec-21 |
14-Dec-21 |
Remedy complete and satisfied |
Adult Care Services |
15-Dec-21 |
Apology |
14-Jan-22 |
17-Jan-22 |
Remedy complete and satisfied |
Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation |
25-Nov-21 |
Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble |
25-Dec-21 |
21-Dec-21 |
Remedy complete and satisfied |
Education & Childrens Services |
21-Mar-22 |
Apology |
21-Apr-22 |
22-Mar-22 |
Remedy complete and satisfied |